Welcome To Industrysourcing
Home >News>News Details

Bringing down cost-per-part

Source: Sandvik Coromant     Date:2021-01-07
Share to Wechat

As a survey by the US National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) showed that 53% of manufacturers expect COVID-19 to impact their operations, manufacturers are under even more pressure to be competitive — including in mass production that involves tough steel components. Here, Rolf Olofsson, Product Manager at Sandvik Coromant, the global leader in metal cutting tools, examines how an alternative approach to steel turning operations help optimize their costs-per-part, and overall profitability.


SAC188 - ST - Bringing down cost per part - 1.jpg

Manufacturing economics determines a company’s profitability. With metal cutting, production economics should focus on ensuring these processes and environments are secure and predictable. There should be two ultimate goals: firstly, maintaining the highest production output and, secondly, the lowest production cost; with each goal being appropriate for a manufacturer’s specific situation.


These goals present challenges in steel turning operations that can experience bottlenecks, production slow-downs or restrictions in the number of components produced per run. And now, there are the wider industry challenges posed by COVID-19. In its response to NAM’s 53% statistic, Pricewaterhouse Coopers commented: “Those grim expectations are already becoming a reality amid plummeting oil prices and demand, supply chain bottlenecks, spending slowdowns and jitters over credit markets.”


Manufacturers, particularly in mass production, are especially conscious of cost-per-part when managing their steel turning operations. The basic principle of cost-per-part is calculated by the total fixed costs plus total variable costs, divided by the total units produced. The parameters of steel turning also depend very much on market demand, with a view to either reducing production costs or increasing output.


Companies that manufacture automotive components, for instance, could face either high or low demand scenarios going forward. Low demand scenarios require tools that can produce more pieces per edge, while providing process security with fewer component rejections. High demand scenarios need tooling solutions that allow increased metal removal rates, reduced cycle times and increase machine utilization with minimal production interruptions.


Whatever scenario they face, manufacturers should strive towards maximizing their machining output which, according to Sandvik Coromant’s findings, can reduce component costs by 15%. But, to achieve this while also maximizing process security, the answer may lie in an alternative approach to tooling.


Reduced non-cutting

Sandvik Coromant calculates that the cost of tools can account for 3 to 5% of the overall manufacturing cost. When considering the purchase of a tool that wears down over time, like a carbide insert for steel turning, it is natural to consider only the initial unit cost. Instead, Sandvik Coromant recommends that its customers look at things a bit differently and reassess how to factor cost-of-tools into managing the whole production costing process, which includes overheads like machinery depreciation.


If we examine a typical working day in a machining shop, let’s say that during two shifts totalling 14.4 hours, 60% of time is devoted to production, or cutting time, while 40% of time is devoted to other things, or non-cutting time. The goal here, of course, should be to reduce the non-cutting time and maximise machining time.


The best way to achieve this is to keep the production time shortened, while increasing the utilization of the machine tool. Indeed, Sandvik Coromant has found that a 20% increase in machine utilization can provide a 10% higher gross profit margin.


Longer tool life

Manufacturers measure production rates in various ways, one being the number of workpieces (pcs) completed over a certain period of time. However, several factors can stop manufacturers from reaching the desired number of work pieces per shift. The need for frequent insert changes, production interruptions, and not finding the right insert for each application or material, are all considered to be the biggest time-killers in modern production.


How can manufacturers overcome these challenges while also working with tough workpieces made from aluminium, unalloyed steels and other workpiece materials? In such cases, the insert grade should be selected primarily for its suitability to the workpiece. This is a challenge because so many variables impact on cutting tool insert performance, so sourcing a single grade to accommodate the wide-ranging demands of P15 to P25 areas can be a thankless task. P15 to P25 refer to the demands that different working conditions impose on machining parameters — cutting data, surface finish, depth of cut, machined or rough surfaces, continuous or interrupted cuts are all affected.


Indeed, there are many prerequisites for any grade making such claims. For instance, fracture resistance is paramount, as is a cutting edge capable of delivering the hardness needed to resist any plastic deformation induced by the extreme temperatures present in the cutting zone. Furthermore, the insert coating must be able to prevent flank wear, crater wear and edge build-up. Crucially, the coating must also adhere to the substrate. If the coating fails to stick, the substrate is exposed, and this can lead to rapid failure.


To avoid these outcomes, it can be said that limiting continuous, controllable wear and eliminating discontinuous, often uncontrollable wear are the keys to success. In other words, predictable tool wear is the goal. Not that complete predictability is easy to achieve, of course, especially considering the current market trend for machining with limited, or no, supervision.


In all instances, the optimum wear pattern for any insert is controlled flank wear as it results in predictable life of cutting edges. The ideal grade is one that limits the development of unwanted types of wear — and in some operations, prevents it from developing at all.


To maximize the number of pieces produced, it is vital to select the right carbide insert — and this is also why Sandvik Coromant will be launching a pair of new ISO P-turning carbide grades in its range, designated GC4415 and GC4425, which refer to P15 and P25 respectively. GC4425 delivers improved wear resistance, heat resistance and toughness, while grade GC4415 is designed to complement GC4425 when enhanced performance and more heat resistance is needed.


Both grades are ideal for use with low-alloyed and unalloyed steel. They can machine a larger number of pieces within a mass and batch production set-up and contribute towards extended tool life, eliminating sudden breakages and reducing reworking and scrap.


The GC4415 and GC4425 grades each contain the second generation Inveio® technology, uni-directional crystal orientation in the alumina coating layer. What makes Inveio unique can be seen by examining the material at a microscopic level: the material’s surface is characterised by a uni-directional crystal orientation. Every crystal in the alumina coating is lined-up in the same direction, which creates a strong barrier towards the cutting zone. The crystal orientation has been improved substantially within the second-generation Inveio coating.


Inveio provides the insert with high wear resistance and longer tool life. Longer lasting tools are, of course, favourable for reducing cost-per-part. In addition, besides other selection parameters, engineers need to consider how the geometry of an insert affects chip control and machining performance.


Better geometry

Geometry refers to the style of the insert itself, which is designed according to the types of machining: finishing, medium and roughing. Each has its own implications with regards to cutting speed — its own working area, based on acceptable chip breaking in relation to the feed rate and depth of cut.


To help customers choose the best turning inserts and grades for their requirements, Sandvik Coromant has made it possible to do so online with the CoroPlus® Tool Guide.


In turning, the three main cutting parameters of speed, feed, and depth of cut have a significant effect on tool life and therefore on cost-per-part, considering that a 20% increase in cutting data can decrease the cost of a component by 10%. A model by an American mechanical engineer, Frederick Winslow Taylor, developed at the beginning of the 20th century, established the relationship between cutting speed, tool wear and tool life.


Taylor concluded that utilizing the largest depth of cut possible reduces the number of cutting passes required and thereby reduces machining time. But, he also advised that optimized steel turning depends on the stability of the clamp into which the tool is mounted, the fixturing of the workpiece and application of coolant for the machine tool, and the power of the machine tool.


Holistic approach

Taylor’s model shows us that optimized steel turning goes beyond grades and geometries. Instead, manufacturers should consider the whole tooling concept. Everything from the insert grade, clamp design and tool-holder can increase output, reduce costs and deliver higher levels of process security.


This holistic and alternative approach was put to the test by a customer in the general engineering segment, using Sandvik Coromant’s GC4425 carbide insert to manufacture a track shaft. GC4425 is designed for improved wear resistance, heat resistance and toughness. In addition, it has the ability to run at higher cutting data. The insert was used on a 4140 pre-heat treated (PHT) steel, a chromium-molybdenum alloy steel with a hardness of 40 HRC (or Hardness Rockwell C). The grade is commonly used in everything from gears and pumps, to various applications in the automotive and construction industries.


The 4140 PHT workpiece was subjected to multi-directional, external roughing. For the test, the performance of GC4425 was compared with a competitor’s ISO-insert used for the same process. Crucially, we were able to increase the cutting speed (vc) and multiply the feed rate (fn) — vc=183 m/min (600 ft/min) and fn=0.33 mm/rev (.013 in/rev) with the competitor’s insert, versus 244 m/min (800 ft/min) vc and 0.51 mm/rev (.020 in/rev) fn with GC4425.


In the end, Sandvik Coromant’s insert allowed a 100% productivity increase with a reduced cycle time of 50%. Overall, the customer achieved a 30% cost reduction.


This result shows that, by considering the whole tooling concept, manufacturers can achieve more profitable production and a lower cost-per-part. This holistic approach to insert grades, geometry and overall manufacturing economics will be vital if manufacturers are to stay competitive against the continuing impact of COVID-19.

SAC188 - ST - Bringing down cost per part - 2.jpg


Back To The Top