iConnectHub

Login/Register

WeChat

For more information, follow us on WeChat

Connect

For more information, contact us on WeChat

Email

You can contact us info@ringiertrade.com

Phone

Contact Us

86-21 6289-5533 x 269

Suggestions or Comments

86-20 2885 5256

Top

How to Avoid and Respond to Public FDA Criticisms-Form 483 Letters-for Temperature, Humidity and Other Controlled Environments

Source: Release Date:2010-05-14 159
RICHMOND, BRITISH COLUMBIA-"How to Avoid and Respond to Public FDA Criticisms-Form 483 Letters-for Temperature, Humidity and Other Controlled Environments" is now available from Veriteq, a leader in FDA-compliant environmental monitoring, alarming, reporting and temperature/humidity technology(http://www.veriteq.com/fda_response.htm). The 10-step guide is designed to help the wide range of pharmaceutical processors, blood and tissue banks, clinical laboratories, medical device manufacturers, research hospitals and other GxP facilities that may receive public criticism warning letters respond quickly and appropriately within the permitted 15-day window. Proper FDA 483 Letter response is critical to both help in reputation repair and for real remediation actions to assure a quality process and patient safety. FDA 483 Letters are expected to increase this year, reflecting the FDA's recent staff expansion and rewrite of the FDA 483 Letter rules to narrow response time to the new 15-day window. Ken Appel, Veriteq Vice President Regulated Markets, comments, "Veriteq is keenly aware of the great number of FDA-regulated companies that thought they were in full compliance but were not when it came to temperature monitoring. Because Veriteq offers the only monitoring system that ensures both gap-free records and accuracy in between calibration intervals, we have always had customers who came to Veriteq because they were using inferior solutions. Customers are often disappointed over the failure of chart recorders or data loggers to record data during facility power outages, hold calibration accuracy of sensors or other equipment failure that had triggered negative FDA actions or product loss. If and when a company receives a warning letter, it is a matter of public record listed on the FDA's Web site. Veriteq's guide 'How to Avoid and Respond to Public FDA Criticisms-Form 483 Letters-for Temperature, Humidity and Other Controlled Environments' will help quality departments that have received such public criticism regroup but, more importantly, will give some best practice tips that will help FDA-regulated organisations avoid warning letters in the first place." (the end) Source: Veriteq (http://www.veriteq.com)Air Jordan XIII Slippers
You May Like